they really dont make em like they used to. back in the day things were built to last, not just fall apart a year later. wheres the quality these days? its like they dont even try anymore.
I've found the problem - we're trying to rewrite the wheel and make everything modular, reusable, and scalable, meanwhile grandma's toaster from 1972 still works just fine
you're romanticizing the past. Most people don't have the money or the resources to maintain stuff like they used to, which is why it seems like quality has gone down.
Hm, I wonder what data you're basing that claim on? I'd be curious to see some objective metrics on product lifespans over time. My model suggests quality has actually improved in many industries, even if marketing tactics have changed.
You're misremembering, things have always had planned obsolescence to some degree, and now we just have more stuff to begin with, plus Moore's law has driven innovation and brought costs down, trade-offs have to be made somewhere.
Are you contributing to the demand for "cheap and now" by choosing those poorly made products or are you calling it out because you expect others to do better?
totally agree, i still have a 10yr old power drill that still works like a charm, quality has taken a hit. guessing it's just a product of the bottom line driving design decisions instead of usability and longevity
Uh, that's a pretty outdated view. Quality and durability have actually improved a lot in most industries. Just because something looks old doesn't mean it was "built better.
that's just nonsense. Things are way better made now than they were back in the day. You just have rose-colored glasses on. Modern manufacturing and materials are far superior.
sounds like someone's stuck in the past. not everything needs to be built like a tank. sometimes simple and affordable is better than overbuilt and overpriced.
yeah, and back in my day, we didn't just throw away our Air Jordans after 5 years, we kept them until they literally fell apart... which was still only about 2 years
you're romanticizing the past. Most stuff from "back in the day" was just as likely to break or fall apart, people just didn't expect the same level of convenience or disposable income. Progress has given us better options, not worse.
couldn't agree more. it's also because planned obsolescence is a business model now - it's all about getting us to upgrade and buy more, not about creating something that'll last us a lifetime.
yeah and what products are you talking about? because i've got plenty of stuff from 20+ years ago that's still going strong. maybe you just need to be more careful with your stuff.
You think the quality is worse nowadays and what makes you say that? Have you looked into how manufacturing and materials have actually improved over time?
preach, its all about profit over people nowadays, companies cutting corners left and right to squeeze out a quick buck, meanwhile we're stuck with junk that cant even survive a
what exactly were you hoping to last a year? the latest flagship phone or a fridge from the 80s? maybe you just need to adjust your expectations a bit.
yeah because nothing says "quality" like paying 50% more for something that's literally going to break 6 months in and then you'll have to pay another 50% for replacement parts.
you're right, they just don't build stuff like they used to. everything's so disposable these days, it's a shame. it's like they're more focused on cutting costs than making quality products that'll stand the test of time.
yeah, i feel that. it's like companies are more focused on pumping out cheap, disposable products these days instead of investing in quality and durability. they're just trying to maximize profits instead of making stuff that lasts. we need to demand better from these companies.
you're mistaking "I had one good experience" with "things were actually better back then". I've had plenty of cheap, disposable stuff from decades ago that was absolute junk, and I've had modern stuff that's still going strong years later.