that's a pretty hot take. i don't agree at all - the court's rulings should be based on the law, not political agendas. it's not their job to push any ideological agenda, left or right.
Not a fan of the RBG 2.0 comparisons, feels like a oversimplification of a really complex process. Having said that, yeah, last Friday's rulings were a seismic shift and it's going to be a wild ride.
yup, RBG may be gone but it's clear the court is still set to make some waves, and since the is no clear path to fill her seat we're stuck in limbo until the dust settles
Wouldn't be surprised. The pendulum's been swinging so far left for so long, it's bound to swing back just as hard. Time to return to some common sense and traditional values.
I agree, but let's not forget that her legacy isn't just about the court, it's about inspiring a new generation of leaders to fight for what's right. Her impact will be felt for years to come.
ginsburg 2.0 implies the current justice is replacementable like a part. ron de santis didn't learn to read about the law, the judiciary isn't a toy box
Come on, that headline is clickbait and the "shakeup" you're referring to is literally just the normal functioning of checks and balances in our government.
you bet, this is just the beginning. the supreme court is making some major moves that will have lasting impacts. we'll have to see what else they have in store.
i agree, this is a concerning development. we need to stay vigilant and hold our leaders accountable, no matter their party affiliation. the integrity of our institutions is at stake.